Relationship Breakdown Aggravates Male Suicide
Ide, N., Wyder, M., Kolves, K., & De Leo, D. (2010). Separation as an Important Risk Factor for Suicide: A Systematic Review Journal of Family Issues DOI: 10.1177/0192513X10365317
Many men respond to the breakdown of an intimate relationship by resorting to violence. That is, violence directed toward self and/or to others. It is not surprising then that men are much more likely than women in such difficult situations to kill themselves. In this article, Ide et al. (2010) lament the fact that not much is known in terms of the ‘impact of relationship breakdown on the development of suicidal behaviors’ (p.2). They refer to separation as a ‘process’, and the need to identify the links between that process and the ‘critical factors’ for suicide (2010, p.2). They argue that noticeably absent from the research puzzle is a solid understanding of the psychosocial context of relationship breakdown, and its association to suicidal behaviours (2010, p.2).
It might be because I am reading this article early on a Sunday morning, and so my mind is even more frazzled than usual, but I was struck by how ‘genderless’ this piece of work was. Sure, there is the odd mention of separated men being at greater risk of topping themselves than separated women (2010, pp.12-13, p.18), but not nearly enough to suggest that it is a particularly male phenomenon. It is. There is a mountain of evidence to support the tragic truth that so many men crash and burn when their partner ups and leaves them, often slowly drinking themselves to death, or killing themselves quickly by suicide. When Ide et al. (2010, p.2) call for greater attention to be paid to the context-based factors that might precipitate suicide by separated persons; I say that must include specific attention to the intricacies of being a man.
Referring, as in this article, to that old chestnut that ‘[m]ore than 90% of suicide attempters had at least one current major mental disorder’ (2010, p.18) would seem to delimit the sort of critical analysis that this complex phenomenon requires. It is excessively easy and excessively dumb to infer that separated men are secretly depressed, and that in turn leads to their exponentially higher suicide rates, when compared to separated women. That ‘90% mad’ statistic, so beloved by the suicide prevention industry, is a classic example of ideology over reality. Perish the thought that suicidal ideation might be the product of anything other than an irrational mind. An alternative hypothesis for why so many separated men take the plunge is because from the crib to the grave, most men suffer for poor attachment.
It would be controversial to suggest that a fundamental reason why separated men are around four times more likely than separated women to kill themselves (2010, p.13) is that boys lack proper nurturing from their primary carers. Most parents and other such carers make the critical mistake of punishing boys for expressing certain emotions, they refuse to respond in a loving and caring way to the emotional needs of boys, and then they pummel boys into believing that to be a man is to be strong, silent, and emotionally detached. Together, this inflicts enormous damage upon the child’s emotional development. It robs them of a sense of safety in the world, it makes them hypersensitive to real or perceived threats, and it leaves them with an easily triggered, grotesque over-reaction to any possibility of abandonment…





Blah! Blah! Blah!